Public Alerts
A partnership between the Center for Forensic Science Research and Education (CFSRE) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Intelligence Group at the Pittsburgh District Office was established to evaluate vape products that were recovered from high schools. The main objective was to differentiate nicotine from cannabis vape products (or others) through comprehensive drug testing, in addition to determining if potentially harmful substances were present and if there was any evidence of mixing, substitution, and/or adulteration with other drugs or substances.
DOWNLOAD THIS REPORT
N-Desethyl isotonitazene is a new synthetic opioid bearing structural resemblance to isotonitazene and recently emergent nitazene analogues. N-Desethyl isotonitazene is dissimilar in chemical structure to fentanyl, the synthetic opioid most commonly encountered, but this subclass of new opioids has been proliferating in the wake of the scheduling of fentanyl analogues. N-Desethyl isotonitazene is a known metabolite of isotonitazene; however, it has now emerged as a primary drug in its own right. Most nitazene analogues encountered retain opioid receptor activity and potency similar to or greater than fentanyl. In vitro pharmacological data show that N-desethyl isotonitazene is an active opioid agonist and is approximately 20x more potent than fentanyl. In December 2022, N-desethyl isotonitazene was first reported by NPS Discovery (Florida); however, first identifications were observed as early as September 2022. To date, seven drug material samples (“dope” powders) collected from the Philadelphia drug supply have tested positive for N-desethyl isotonitazene. In December 2022, the Philadelphia Department of Public Health issued an alert regarding the discovery of this new nitazene analogue in the city’s drug supply. The toxicity of N-desethyl isotonitazene has not been examined or reported but recent association with overdoses among people who use drugs leads professionals to believe this synthetic opioid has the potential to cause harm and is of high public health concern.
DOWNLOAD THE ALERT
Download the Alert
Download the Alert
Download the Alert
DOWNLOAD THE ALERT
DOWNLOAD THE ALERT
Drug use can lead to adverse events and overdose scenarios where individuals present to emergency departments for clinical evaluation and/or treatment. The culprit can be traditional drugs (e.g., heroin, fentanyl, cocaine, methamphetamine) or novel psychoactive substances (NPS); however, proper drug testing methodologies must be employed for accurate identification and characterization. A partnership between the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) and the Center for Forensic Science Research and Education (CFSRE) was established to comprehensively assess the role and prevalence of synthetic opioids and other drugs among suspected overdose events in the United States. Patients with a suspected opioid overdose presented to an emergency department at a participating site within ACMT’s Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC). Residual, discarded biological samples were obtained for testing against an expansive library of drugs and other substances.
DOWNLOAD THE ALERT
Synthetic cannabinoids represent a vastly diverse sub-class of novel psychoactive substances (NPS). The turnover of this sub-class is largely linked to drug scheduling actions and, like other sub-classes of NPS, new drugs were historically produced via slight tweaks to the molecular structure. In May 2021, China announced new legislation to control synthetic cannabinoids as a class using commonly encountered structural backbones. This has resulted in the emergence of new generations of synthetic cannabinoids with core components that were previously unencountered and/or not well characterized. An example is “MDA-19” and its related analogues. “MDA-19” is a CB2 agonist and was studied, like many synthetic cannabinoids, under legitimate research for pharmaceutical purposes. Similar to JWH-018 and other early synthetic cannabinoids, naming conventions utilizing the initials of a researcher or organization are not ideal and may be misleading (e.g., the abbreviation “MDA” is also used for the stimulant drug methylenedioxyamphetamine). A well-accepted systematic naming convention exists for synthetic cannabinoids and should be applied, where appropriate, to avoid any confusion or mischaracterization.
DOWNLOAD THE ALERT
DOWNLOAD THE ALERT